Successive regimes have shown capacity to deliver fiscal discipline but, equally, a casual attitude to slippages: Rathin Roy
The new government, whatever form it takes, should focus on a few key aspects of the economy such as tackling income inequality on a priority basis, cleaning up bank balance sheets rather than delaying the clean-up, being more fiscally disciplined, and being more accountable for the revenue projections made in a year, according to noted economists.
“I would say that we have postponed cleaning up the balance sheets of banks and NBFCs for a long time,” Ila Patnaik, Professor at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), said.
“That should be a top priority because the economy needs healthy credit growth. What has been done so far has pretty much postponed the clean-up because while we have done Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), not too much has gone through it.”
Apart from this, the view also is that while the successive governments have shown that they have the capacity to be fiscally disciplined, there is also a very casual attitude to slippages. There needs to be more accountability regarding the projections made.
“Successive governments promised to deliver fiscal discipline,” Rathin Roy, Director of NIPFP, said.
“They have shown capacity to do so but, equally, a casual attitude when there are slippages and a disconcerting willingness to play silly accounting games. Tax policy needs to be based on forecasts for which policy-makers are accountable, rather than on estimates and targets and tinkering with tax rates, to macroeconomic detriment.”
On disinvestment
Further, Dr. Roy said the government needs to take a more systematic approach to disinvestment and not treat it as an ad-hoc measure to meet any shortfalls in revenue.
“In my view, reform of government economic administration must take priority,” Dr. Roy added.
“As things stand, it is a prerequisite for the success of any other reform. A weak state cannot deliver anything other than grandiloquent statements of intention. This must change.”
Another matter of great urgency, according to experts, is the level of poverty and income inequality in the country.
“Whatever government comes, they have to do something about the fast elimination of poverty,” Parthasarathi Shome, adviser to the Finance Minister during the UPA-II government, said.
“We also have to do something very urgent about reducing wealth concentration and improving income distribution, because irrespective of the data that has come out of India, data from the World Bank and United Nations shows that we are in very dire straits on all these factors.”
Wealth tax
The new government should incorporate a tax on wealth above ₹50 crore. He said that this wealth should be calculated on the basis of both financial and non-financial assets, since many high net-worth individuals place their wealth in financial assets.
“There should also be a super-rich income tax above ₹5-10 crore income per year, where the rate should be 45%,” Dr. Shome said.
“People forget that if you convert rupees into pounds or euros, then the tax rates in those developed countries are much higher than the equivalent rates we have today,” Dr. Shome added.
No comments:
Post a Comment